{"id":545,"date":"2026-05-08T10:26:49","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T10:26:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/?p=545"},"modified":"2026-05-08T10:34:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T10:34:14","slug":"can-homebuyers-file-insolvency-against-builder-for-delay-nclat-clarifies-the-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/can-homebuyers-file-insolvency-against-builder-for-delay-nclat-clarifies-the-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Homebuyers File Insolvency Against Builder for Delay?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"545\" class=\"elementor elementor-545\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7c12916f e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"7c12916f\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7684e17b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"7684e17b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Introduction<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The judgment in <strong>Gajraj Jain &amp; Ors versus Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd.<\/strong> is an important decision for homebuyers who consider filing insolvency proceedings against builders due to delay in possession or pending occupancy certificates. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) clarified that insolvency law cannot be used in every builder-buyer dispute, especially where the project is substantially complete and fit for occupation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Background of the Case<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The homebuyers had booked residential flats in the builder\u2019s project with an expectation that possession would be delivered by 31 March 2017. According to the buyers, the builder failed to hand over the units within the promised timeline and also failed to compensate them for the delay. Another major grievance raised by the buyers was that the builder had not obtained the Occupancy Certificate or Completion Certificate from the competent authority, due to which legal possession and registration of flats could not be completed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Aggrieved by the delay and absence of final approvals, the homebuyers approached the insolvency forum seeking initiation of proceedings against the builder under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Issue Before the Court<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The principal issue before the NCLAT was whether insolvency proceedings should be initiated merely because there was delay in handing over possession or because the Occupancy Certificate had not yet been issued, even though the project appeared physically complete.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Observations of the NCLAT<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">While examining the matter, the Tribunal noted from the photographs and material placed on record that the towers and flats appeared to be substantially complete and in a habitable condition. The Court also observed that many buyers had already shifted into their flats and had executed final sale documents.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Regarding the absence of Occupancy Certificate, the Tribunal observed that the builder had already initiated the process for obtaining the certificate in 2017 itself. According to the Court, the delay appeared to be related to technical and procedural formalities rather than actual incompletion of the project.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One of the most significant observations made by the Tribunal was regarding the misuse of insolvency proceedings. The Court stated that insolvency law should not become an \u201carm-twisting tactic\u201d against builders. It emphasized that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is intended to resolve cases of genuine financial insolvency and not to settle ordinary disputes relating to delay, compensation, or quality of construction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Tribunal further observed that dissatisfied homebuyers have other legal remedies available under consumer law, RERA, or civil proceedings for addressing such grievances.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Section Interpreted<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Tribunal discussed <strong>Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/strong>, which allows financial creditors, including homebuyers, to initiate insolvency proceedings against a defaulting company.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">However, the Court clarified that this provision should not be invoked mechanically in every delayed possession case. The object of insolvency law is resolution of insolvency and revival of companies, not recovery proceedings for individual disputes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Law Settled by the Judgment<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This judgment settled an important legal principle that insolvency proceedings are not the appropriate remedy in every builder-buyer dispute. Where a project is substantially complete and habitable, the builder may not be pushed into insolvency merely because some approvals or certificates are pending.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court clarified that disputes relating to delayed possession, compensation, or pending Occupancy Certificates can be addressed through other legal mechanisms and do not automatically justify insolvency proceedings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Final Judgment<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The NCLAT refused to initiate insolvency proceedings against the builder and upheld the earlier order. However, the Tribunal directed the builder to obtain the Occupancy Certificate or Completion Certificate at the earliest. The Court also observed that the homebuyers could use the order before government authorities to facilitate faster issuance of the pending certificates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Conclusion<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The decision in <strong>Gajraj Jain &amp; Ors versus Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd.<\/strong> draws a clear distinction between genuine insolvency and ordinary builder-buyer disputes. The judgment makes it clear that insolvency law cannot be used merely as a pressure mechanism against builders when the project is substantially complete.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For homebuyers, the ruling serves as an important reminder that while IBC is a powerful remedy, disputes concerning delay, compensation, or pending approvals may be better suited for remedies under RERA, consumer law, or civil courts rather than insolvency proceedings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7d68816 elementor-shape-rounded elementor-grid-0 e-grid-align-center elementor-widget elementor-widget-social-icons\" data-id=\"7d68816\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"social-icons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-social-icons-wrapper elementor-grid\" role=\"list\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-youtube elementor-repeater-item-965ac60\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCBYhCOJ-ZtiZDCt2NJRz2nA\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Youtube<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-youtube\" viewBox=\"0 0 576 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M549.655 124.083c-6.281-23.65-24.787-42.276-48.284-48.597C458.781 64 288 64 288 64S117.22 64 74.629 75.486c-23.497 6.322-42.003 24.947-48.284 48.597-11.412 42.867-11.412 132.305-11.412 132.305s0 89.438 11.412 132.305c6.281 23.65 24.787 41.5 48.284 47.821C117.22 448 288 448 288 448s170.78 0 213.371-11.486c23.497-6.321 42.003-24.171 48.284-47.821 11.412-42.867 11.412-132.305 11.412-132.305s0-89.438-11.412-132.305zm-317.51 213.508V175.185l142.739 81.205-142.739 81.201z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-instagram elementor-repeater-item-0eccafb\" href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/mudralegal\/\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Instagram<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-instagram\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M224.1 141c-63.6 0-114.9 51.3-114.9 114.9s51.3 114.9 114.9 114.9S339 319.5 339 255.9 287.7 141 224.1 141zm0 189.6c-41.1 0-74.7-33.5-74.7-74.7s33.5-74.7 74.7-74.7 74.7 33.5 74.7 74.7-33.6 74.7-74.7 74.7zm146.4-194.3c0 14.9-12 26.8-26.8 26.8-14.9 0-26.8-12-26.8-26.8s12-26.8 26.8-26.8 26.8 12 26.8 26.8zm76.1 27.2c-1.7-35.9-9.9-67.7-36.2-93.9-26.2-26.2-58-34.4-93.9-36.2-37-2.1-147.9-2.1-184.9 0-35.8 1.7-67.6 9.9-93.9 36.1s-34.4 58-36.2 93.9c-2.1 37-2.1 147.9 0 184.9 1.7 35.9 9.9 67.7 36.2 93.9s58 34.4 93.9 36.2c37 2.1 147.9 2.1 184.9 0 35.9-1.7 67.7-9.9 93.9-36.2 26.2-26.2 34.4-58 36.2-93.9 2.1-37 2.1-147.8 0-184.8zM398.8 388c-7.8 19.6-22.9 34.7-42.6 42.6-29.5 11.7-99.5 9-132.1 9s-102.7 2.6-132.1-9c-19.6-7.8-34.7-22.9-42.6-42.6-11.7-29.5-9-99.5-9-132.1s-2.6-102.7 9-132.1c7.8-19.6 22.9-34.7 42.6-42.6 29.5-11.7 99.5-9 132.1-9s102.7-2.6 132.1 9c19.6 7.8 34.7 22.9 42.6 42.6 11.7 29.5 9 99.5 9 132.1s2.7 102.7-9 132.1z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-linkedin elementor-repeater-item-886e77c\" href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/mudra-legal\/posts\/?feedView=all&#038;viewAsMember=true\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Linkedin<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-linkedin\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M416 32H31.9C14.3 32 0 46.5 0 64.3v383.4C0 465.5 14.3 480 31.9 480H416c17.6 0 32-14.5 32-32.3V64.3c0-17.8-14.4-32.3-32-32.3zM135.4 416H69V202.2h66.5V416zm-33.2-243c-21.3 0-38.5-17.3-38.5-38.5S80.9 96 102.2 96c21.2 0 38.5 17.3 38.5 38.5 0 21.3-17.2 38.5-38.5 38.5zm282.1 243h-66.4V312c0-24.8-.5-56.7-34.5-56.7-34.6 0-39.9 27-39.9 54.9V416h-66.4V202.2h63.7v29.2h.9c8.9-16.8 30.6-34.5 62.9-34.5 67.2 0 79.7 44.3 79.7 101.9V416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The judgment in Gajraj Jain &amp; Ors versus Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd. is an important decision for homebuyers who [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":555,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23-300x144.png",300,144,true],"large":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Add-a-heading-23.png",678,325,false]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Mudralegal","author_link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/author\/mudralegal\/"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/category\/uncategorized\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Uncategorized<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Introduction The judgment in Gajraj Jain &amp; Ors versus Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd. is an important decision for homebuyers who [&hellip;]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=545"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":557,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545\/revisions\/557"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}