{"id":511,"date":"2026-04-24T06:09:56","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/?p=511"},"modified":"2026-04-24T06:39:08","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:39:08","slug":"supreme-court-judgment-on-builder-delay-18-interest-granted-to-homebuyer-in-refund-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/supreme-court-judgment-on-builder-delay-18-interest-granted-to-homebuyer-in-refund-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Judgment on Builder Delay: 18% Interest Granted to Homebuyer in Refund Case"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"511\" class=\"elementor elementor-511\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-54e2689d e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"54e2689d\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-74851f73 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"74851f73\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Introduction<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In a significant relief for homebuyers facing long delays and unfair builder practices, the Supreme Court in <strong>Rajnesh Sharma vs. M\/S. Business Park Town Planners Ltd.<\/strong> has clarified when higher interest can be awarded in refund cases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This judgment directly addresses common issues faced by allottees\u2014delayed possession, unilateral changes by builders, and unfair financial terms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Background of the Case<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The case revolves around a homebuyer who booked a plot in 2006 and paid more than \u20b943 lakhs by 2015. Despite substantial payment, possession was not offered until 2018, resulting in a delay of more than 10 years.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The buyer approached the consumer forum seeking a refund. The <strong>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<\/strong> (NCDRC) ordered refund with 9% interest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">However, the buyer challenged this decision before the Supreme Court on the following grounds:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The builder charged <strong>18% interest<\/strong> for delayed payments by the buyer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Possession was delayed by over a decade<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The builder changed the plot without proper justification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Additional unexplained charges were imposed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Key Legal Issues Before the Supreme Court<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court examined a crucial question:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Whether awarding only 9% interest was justified despite the builder\u2019s conduct and the excessive delay?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court also considered whether a higher rate\u2014matching the builder\u2019s own penal interest\u2014should be imposed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:separator --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Supreme Court\u2019s Observations<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">1. Inordinate Delay in Possession<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court observed that possession was promised within 24 months of approvals. However, no offer was made for more than 10 years.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Such delay was considered unreasonable and unjustified.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:separator --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">2. Unjustified Plot Change by Builder<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The builder argued that the plot was changed due to government-mandated revisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">However, the Court noted that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">No evidence from any statutory authority was produced<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The change appeared unilateral and arbitrary<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:separator --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">3. Principle of Fairness and Parity<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One of the most important observations was on fairness:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The builder charged <strong>18% interest<\/strong> from the buyer for delays<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But was allowed to pay only <strong>9% interest<\/strong> on refund<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court held that this creates an imbalance and is unfair.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It emphasized that a builder cannot impose strict financial terms on buyers but escape with minimal liability when they themselves default.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:separator --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">4. Interest Rate Must Reflect Conduct<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court clarified that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Interest is not merely compensatory<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It must also reflect the conduct of the builder<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In cases involving:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Long delays<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Harassment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Financial imbalance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">A higher rate of interest is justified.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Legal Provision Considered<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The judgment interpreted provisions under the:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Particularly:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Section 14<\/strong> \u2013 Power of consumer forums to grant compensation for loss or injury<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court emphasized that compensation must be fair, reasonable, and based on the facts of each case.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Law Settled by the Supreme Court<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This judgment lays down an important principle for homebuyers:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">There is <strong>no fixed rule<\/strong> that interest must be limited to a standard rate like 9%<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Courts can award <strong>higher interest based on facts and fairness<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">If a builder charges high penal interest (like 18%), the same rate can be imposed on the builder in case of default<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Each case must be decided based on delay, conduct, and financial impact on the buyer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Final Judgment and Relief Granted<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal and held:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><!-- wp:list-item --><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Interest increased from <strong>9% to 18% per annum<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Builder directed to refund full amount with interest<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Payment to be made within <strong>two months<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:separator --><!-- wp:heading --><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span style=\"font-size: 1.875rem; font-style: inherit; color: #000000;\">Conclusion<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:heading --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court has reinforced that fairness must prevail in real estate disputes. Where a builder benefits from high penal clauses, they must also bear similar consequences for their own defaults.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For homebuyers, this judgment serves as a strong precedent to claim higher interest in delayed possession or refund cases, especially where the builder\u2019s conduct is unjustified.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7e110a7 elementor-shape-rounded elementor-grid-0 e-grid-align-center elementor-widget elementor-widget-social-icons\" data-id=\"7e110a7\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"social-icons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-social-icons-wrapper elementor-grid\" role=\"list\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-youtube elementor-repeater-item-018c390\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCBYhCOJ-ZtiZDCt2NJRz2nA\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Youtube<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-youtube\" viewBox=\"0 0 576 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M549.655 124.083c-6.281-23.65-24.787-42.276-48.284-48.597C458.781 64 288 64 288 64S117.22 64 74.629 75.486c-23.497 6.322-42.003 24.947-48.284 48.597-11.412 42.867-11.412 132.305-11.412 132.305s0 89.438 11.412 132.305c6.281 23.65 24.787 41.5 48.284 47.821C117.22 448 288 448 288 448s170.78 0 213.371-11.486c23.497-6.321 42.003-24.171 48.284-47.821 11.412-42.867 11.412-132.305 11.412-132.305s0-89.438-11.412-132.305zm-317.51 213.508V175.185l142.739 81.205-142.739 81.201z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-linkedin elementor-repeater-item-c58c54f\" href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/mudra-legal\/posts\/?feedView=all\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Linkedin<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-linkedin\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M416 32H31.9C14.3 32 0 46.5 0 64.3v383.4C0 465.5 14.3 480 31.9 480H416c17.6 0 32-14.5 32-32.3V64.3c0-17.8-14.4-32.3-32-32.3zM135.4 416H69V202.2h66.5V416zm-33.2-243c-21.3 0-38.5-17.3-38.5-38.5S80.9 96 102.2 96c21.2 0 38.5 17.3 38.5 38.5 0 21.3-17.2 38.5-38.5 38.5zm282.1 243h-66.4V312c0-24.8-.5-56.7-34.5-56.7-34.6 0-39.9 27-39.9 54.9V416h-66.4V202.2h63.7v29.2h.9c8.9-16.8 30.6-34.5 62.9-34.5 67.2 0 79.7 44.3 79.7 101.9V416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-instagram elementor-repeater-item-da7e47b\" href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/mudralegal\/\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Instagram<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-instagram\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M224.1 141c-63.6 0-114.9 51.3-114.9 114.9s51.3 114.9 114.9 114.9S339 319.5 339 255.9 287.7 141 224.1 141zm0 189.6c-41.1 0-74.7-33.5-74.7-74.7s33.5-74.7 74.7-74.7 74.7 33.5 74.7 74.7-33.6 74.7-74.7 74.7zm146.4-194.3c0 14.9-12 26.8-26.8 26.8-14.9 0-26.8-12-26.8-26.8s12-26.8 26.8-26.8 26.8 12 26.8 26.8zm76.1 27.2c-1.7-35.9-9.9-67.7-36.2-93.9-26.2-26.2-58-34.4-93.9-36.2-37-2.1-147.9-2.1-184.9 0-35.8 1.7-67.6 9.9-93.9 36.1s-34.4 58-36.2 93.9c-2.1 37-2.1 147.9 0 184.9 1.7 35.9 9.9 67.7 36.2 93.9s58 34.4 93.9 36.2c37 2.1 147.9 2.1 184.9 0 35.9-1.7 67.7-9.9 93.9-36.2 26.2-26.2 34.4-58 36.2-93.9 2.1-37 2.1-147.8 0-184.8zM398.8 388c-7.8 19.6-22.9 34.7-42.6 42.6-29.5 11.7-99.5 9-132.1 9s-102.7 2.6-132.1-9c-19.6-7.8-34.7-22.9-42.6-42.6-11.7-29.5-9-99.5-9-132.1s-2.6-102.7 9-132.1c7.8-19.6 22.9-34.7 42.6-42.6 29.5-11.7 99.5-9 132.1-9s102.7-2.6 132.1 9c19.6 7.8 34.7 22.9 42.6 42.6 11.7 29.5 9 99.5 9 132.1s2.7 102.7-9 132.1z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction In a significant relief for homebuyers facing long delays and unfair builder practices, the Supreme Court in Rajnesh Sharma [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":516,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19-300x144.png",300,144,true],"large":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Add-a-heading-19.png",678,325,false]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Mudralegal","author_link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/author\/mudralegal\/"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/category\/uncategorized\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Uncategorized<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Introduction In a significant relief for homebuyers facing long delays and unfair builder practices, the Supreme Court in Rajnesh Sharma [&hellip;]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=511"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":518,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511\/revisions\/518"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/516"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}