{"id":468,"date":"2025-11-21T06:44:59","date_gmt":"2025-11-21T06:44:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/?p=468"},"modified":"2025-11-21T06:55:31","modified_gmt":"2025-11-21T06:55:31","slug":"did-the-supreme-court-allow-18-interest-to-the-buyer-civil-appeal-no-3988-of-2023-rajnesh-sharma-vs-vs-m-s-business-park-town-planners-ltd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/did-the-supreme-court-allow-18-interest-to-the-buyer-civil-appeal-no-3988-of-2023-rajnesh-sharma-vs-vs-m-s-business-park-town-planners-ltd\/","title":{"rendered":"Did the Supreme Court Allow 18% Interest to the Buyer? \u2013 Civil Appeal No. 3988 of 2023 (Rajnesh Sharma \u00a0VS. vs. M\/s Business Park Town Planners Ltd.)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"468\" class=\"elementor elementor-468\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-479fbb3a e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"479fbb3a\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2323c552 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"2323c552\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Issues Raised \u2013 the problems or questions brought before the court.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The buyer (appellant) challenged an order from the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) (the lower consumer court). The buyer argued that the Consumer Commission was wrong to award him only 9% simple interest on his refund amount. This rate was deemed too low and caused him a huge loss, especially since the developer (respondent) charged the buyer 18% interest on any payment delays he made. The buyer also claimed that the developer charged various excessive and unexplained costs, delayed possession of the plot for over a decade (booked in 2006, offered in 2018), and changed the plot location without proper justification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Issues Framed \u2013 the main questions the court decided to examine.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The core question was <strong>whether the Consumer Commission made a mistake by only awarding 9% interest per year for the delay compensation<\/strong>, instead of a higher rate, given:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The conditions stated in the agreement.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The extent of the delay in offering possession.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The poor conduct of the developer.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The 18% interest rate the developer charged the buyer for his payment defaults.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Observations on Issues Framed \u2013 what the court noticed or said on each issue.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The court noted that the lower court (NCDRC) disposed of the matter merely based on the developer\u2019s offer to pay 9% interest, without fully examining the merits of the buyer&#8217;s case or confirming the buyer accepted the offer.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The court confirmed that the interest amount must always be <strong>reasonable<\/strong>, and what is reasonable changes depending on the specific facts of each case.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The court analyzed past judgments and determined that there is <strong>no strict legal rule<\/strong> preventing the buyer from receiving the same high interest rate (18%) that the developer charged them.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The developer\u2019s conduct was heavily scrutinized. The agreement required possession within 24 months of service plan sanction, but no offer of possession was made until 2018.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The developer changed the plot location in 2011 by invoking Clause 7, citing changes required by a government authority, but the developer failed to provide any evidence during the arguments to show that a statutory authority actually required the change.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The court found that the developer&#8217;s conduct included charging 18% interest to the buyer for delays and making the buyer wait for a decade, causing harassment and anxiety.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Allowing the developer to pay only 9% interest for their severe default while they charged 18% to the buyer would permit them to escape with a &#8220;nominal liability&#8221;.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Fairness and justice<\/strong> require that the developer be held to the same high standard (18%) they imposed on the buyer for default, as holding otherwise would be continuing a &#8220;manifestly wrong bargain&#8221;.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Sections Interpreted \u2013 the sections of law and Act names discussed by the court.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The court discussed Section 14 (l) (d) of the <strong>Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/strong> (referred to as &#8216;the Act&#8217;). This section relates to the power of the District Forum (and by extension the NCDRC) to order compensation to a consumer for any <strong>loss or injury suffered due to the negligence of the opposite party<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Law Settled \u2013 the legal rule or principle made clear by the court.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The established legal rule is that the amount of interest (delay compensation) awarded to a consumer must be <strong>reasonable<\/strong> based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case. Although there is no mandatory rule that the consumer must receive the same rate the builder charged, when a developer charges a consumer a high rate of interest (like 18%) for default, it is required by <strong>equity and fairness<\/strong> that the developer face similar consequences for their own severe default. The court must prevent the continuation of a one-sided or &#8220;manifestly wrong bargain&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Judgment \/ Directions (Conclusion) \u2013 the final order or directions of the court.<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The appeal was partially successful.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court directed the developer to refund the entire principal amount paid by the buyer.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The interest rate for the refund is <strong>increased from 9% to 18% per year<\/strong>.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The interest must be paid simply, from the date of each payment the buyer made until the date of the refund.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The developer must complete the refund of the money within <strong>two months<\/strong> from the date of the judgment.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">All other parts of the original Consumer Commission\u2019s order (such as the award of Rs. 25,000\/- for legal costs) remain in place.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Disclaimer:<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is a <strong>non-reportable judgment<\/strong> provided solely for educational and informational purposes. It is not intended to be legal advice or a substitute for professional consultation. Judicial observations and conclusions described herein are specific to the facts of this case and may not apply in other situations. Readers are advised to consult a qualified legal professional before relying on or acting upon any information mentioned in this article.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-ea826fc e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"ea826fc\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-514b6fd elementor-shape-rounded elementor-grid-0 e-grid-align-center elementor-widget elementor-widget-social-icons\" data-id=\"514b6fd\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"social-icons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-social-icons-wrapper elementor-grid\" role=\"list\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-youtube elementor-repeater-item-75292fb\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCBYhCOJ-ZtiZDCt2NJRz2nA\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Youtube<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-youtube\" viewBox=\"0 0 576 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M549.655 124.083c-6.281-23.65-24.787-42.276-48.284-48.597C458.781 64 288 64 288 64S117.22 64 74.629 75.486c-23.497 6.322-42.003 24.947-48.284 48.597-11.412 42.867-11.412 132.305-11.412 132.305s0 89.438 11.412 132.305c6.281 23.65 24.787 41.5 48.284 47.821C117.22 448 288 448 288 448s170.78 0 213.371-11.486c23.497-6.321 42.003-24.171 48.284-47.821 11.412-42.867 11.412-132.305 11.412-132.305s0-89.438-11.412-132.305zm-317.51 213.508V175.185l142.739 81.205-142.739 81.201z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-instagram elementor-repeater-item-ef6c304\" href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/mudralegal\/\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Instagram<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-instagram\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M224.1 141c-63.6 0-114.9 51.3-114.9 114.9s51.3 114.9 114.9 114.9S339 319.5 339 255.9 287.7 141 224.1 141zm0 189.6c-41.1 0-74.7-33.5-74.7-74.7s33.5-74.7 74.7-74.7 74.7 33.5 74.7 74.7-33.6 74.7-74.7 74.7zm146.4-194.3c0 14.9-12 26.8-26.8 26.8-14.9 0-26.8-12-26.8-26.8s12-26.8 26.8-26.8 26.8 12 26.8 26.8zm76.1 27.2c-1.7-35.9-9.9-67.7-36.2-93.9-26.2-26.2-58-34.4-93.9-36.2-37-2.1-147.9-2.1-184.9 0-35.8 1.7-67.6 9.9-93.9 36.1s-34.4 58-36.2 93.9c-2.1 37-2.1 147.9 0 184.9 1.7 35.9 9.9 67.7 36.2 93.9s58 34.4 93.9 36.2c37 2.1 147.9 2.1 184.9 0 35.9-1.7 67.7-9.9 93.9-36.2 26.2-26.2 34.4-58 36.2-93.9 2.1-37 2.1-147.8 0-184.8zM398.8 388c-7.8 19.6-22.9 34.7-42.6 42.6-29.5 11.7-99.5 9-132.1 9s-102.7 2.6-132.1-9c-19.6-7.8-34.7-22.9-42.6-42.6-11.7-29.5-9-99.5-9-132.1s-2.6-102.7 9-132.1c7.8-19.6 22.9-34.7 42.6-42.6 29.5-11.7 99.5-9 132.1-9s102.7-2.6 132.1 9c19.6 7.8 34.7 22.9 42.6 42.6 11.7 29.5 9 99.5 9 132.1s2.7 102.7-9 132.1z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-grid-item\" role=\"listitem\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a class=\"elementor-icon elementor-social-icon elementor-social-icon-linkedin elementor-repeater-item-f17dd86\" href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/mudra-legal\/posts\/?feedView=all\" target=\"_blank\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-screen-only\">Linkedin<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg class=\"e-font-icon-svg e-fab-linkedin\" viewBox=\"0 0 448 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M416 32H31.9C14.3 32 0 46.5 0 64.3v383.4C0 465.5 14.3 480 31.9 480H416c17.6 0 32-14.5 32-32.3V64.3c0-17.8-14.4-32.3-32-32.3zM135.4 416H69V202.2h66.5V416zm-33.2-243c-21.3 0-38.5-17.3-38.5-38.5S80.9 96 102.2 96c21.2 0 38.5 17.3 38.5 38.5 0 21.3-17.2 38.5-38.5 38.5zm282.1 243h-66.4V312c0-24.8-.5-56.7-34.5-56.7-34.6 0-39.9 27-39.9 54.9V416h-66.4V202.2h63.7v29.2h.9c8.9-16.8 30.6-34.5 62.9-34.5 67.2 0 79.7 44.3 79.7 101.9V416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Issues Raised \u2013 the problems or questions brought before the court. The buyer (appellant) challenged an order from the National [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":479,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[14,4,5,7],"class_list":["post-468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-builder-buyer-disputes","tag-real-estate","tag-real-estate-laws","tag-rera-advocate"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17-300x144.png",300,144,true],"large":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Add-a-heading-17.png",678,325,false]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Mudralegal","author_link":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/author\/mudralegal\/"},"rttpg_comment":1,"rttpg_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/category\/uncategorized\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Uncategorized<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Issues Raised \u2013 the problems or questions brought before the court. The buyer (appellant) challenged an order from the National [&hellip;]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=468"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":480,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions\/480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mudralegal.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}